Michael Rossi

Framer Development

Webflow: Too Little, Too Late

Webflow, once a leader in no-code website building, is losing ground to competitors like Framer, which has rapidly innovated with modern features and a faster development pace. Despite Webflow's strengths, such as a large user base and strong SEO capabilities, its slow response to community needs and market changes has led to a significant migration of users to more adaptable platforms. To regain its position, Webflow must fundamentally change its approach to product development and feature prioritization, as the no-code landscape continues to evolve swiftly.

Jul 21, 2025

0 min read

In the fast-paced world of no-code website builders, timing is everything. A few years ago, Webflow emerged as the designer's dream platform—a powerful visual development environment that offered unprecedented control without requiring deep coding knowledge. It was revolutionary, promising, and for a while, unmatched.

But the tech landscape waits for no one, and what was once cutting-edge can quickly become yesterday's news.

The Golden Days of Webflow

When Webflow first gained traction, it represented a significant leap forward from restrictive template-based builders like Wix and Squarespace. Designers flocked to the platform for its intuitive interface that finally translated design thinking into functional websites without compromising on flexibility or quality.

The platform's visual CSS editor, responsive design capabilities, and CMS functionality created a compelling package that seemed to suggest a bright future where design and development would become increasingly unified.

The Warning Signs

However, as competitors evolved and new players entered the market, Webflow's pace of innovation began to seem glacial in comparison. Feature requests from the community piled up, with many crucial improvements sitting in the "planned" stage for years:

  • Multi-language support remained elusive despite being a standard requirement for global businesses

  • Advanced animation capabilities lagged behind emerging standards

  • Collaboration features failed to evolve for team environments

  • Component-based design systems – a fundamental shift in web design – were slow to implement

While Webflow's team continued to refine their core offering, the wider market was racing ahead with innovative approaches to web creation that addressed emerging needs more rapidly.

Enter Framer: The New Darling

Into this environment stepped Framer, originally known as a prototyping tool, which evolved with remarkable speed into a comprehensive website building platform. Framer didn't just catch up to Webflow—in many ways, it leapfrogged it by embracing modern development paradigms from the start:

  • Component-based architecture aligned with how developers were already working in React

  • Smart animations that were both powerful and accessible

  • Integration-friendly approach that recognized websites as part of larger digital ecosystems

  • Rapid implementation of AI-assisted design features

Most importantly, Framer moved fast—very fast. Features requested by users appeared in months, not years. The platform evolved visibly with each passing quarter, creating momentum and excitement that Webflow struggled to match.

The Great Migration

We're now witnessing what many in the industry are calling "The Great Migration" as designers and agencies who built their workflows around Webflow are reassessing their toolkits. Client projects that would have defaulted to Webflow a year ago are increasingly being built in Framer.

This shift isn't happening because Webflow suddenly became worse—it's happening because the expectations of what a modern web creation platform should offer have evolved, and Webflow's pace of adaptation hasn't kept up.

Lessons in Innovation Timing

The Webflow story offers valuable lessons for any technology company:

  1. Market leadership is temporary without continuous innovation

  2. Community feature requests aren't just wish lists—they're market signals

  3. When implementation timelines stretch too long, they create openings for competitors

  4. A strong initial product isn't enough; evolution needs to match or exceed market pace

Is It Too Late for Webflow?

Webflow still has significant strengths—a large user base, strong SEO capabilities, and robust CMS functionality that continues to serve many businesses well. The company isn't going anywhere soon.

However, reclaiming the innovation leader position will require more than incremental improvements. It will take a fundamental shift in how the company approaches product development and feature prioritization.

For users and agencies, the wise approach is increasingly platform-agnostic. The days of building a business exclusively around Webflow are likely behind us, replaced by a more adaptable strategy that leverages the best tool for each specific project need.

Looking Forward

The no-code space continues to evolve rapidly, with AI-powered design tools further accelerating what's possible. Webflow's story isn't over, but its position as the unquestioned leader for professional designers has been compromised by its cautious approach to innovation.

In technology, timing isn't just about being first to market—it's about maintaining momentum through continuous evolution. For Webflow, the pace of that evolution proved too little, too late to prevent the rise of alternatives that better addressed the evolving needs of modern designers.

What tools are you using for your web projects now? Have you made the switch from Webflow to Framer or another platform?

Share on

Ready to

Push Refresh?

Ready to

Push Refresh?

Ready to

Push Refresh?